RMSCC Red Meat Data Standards Post-Meeting Survey

Post-meeting survey for the first Working Group meeting of the Data Reporting and Feedback Data Standards Development Project.

How relevant to your organisation<'>s work was the information presented and discussed in the meeting?

1. Extremely relevant
2. Very relevant
3. Moderately relevant
4. Slightly relevant
5. Not at all relevant
6. Not enough information to judge

Simply enter the number that corresponds to your response.

How compelling did you find the case for industry data standards to address disconnected data across the supply chain?

1. Extremely compelling
2. Very compelling
3. Moderately compelling
4. Slightly compelling
5. Not at all compelling
6. Not sure

Simply enter the number that corresponds to your response.

Which aspects of the presentation strengthened the case for industry data standards, and which aspects weakened it?

Open response.

How useful was the animal-sex example in showing why compatible data language matters?

1. Extremely useful
2. Very useful
3. Moderately useful
4. Slightly useful
5. Not at all useful
6. Not sure

Simply enter the number that corresponds to your response.

How much value do you think industry-owned and maintained data standards could deliver for your organisation?

1. Very significant value
2. Significant value
3. Moderate value
4. Limited value
5. No value
6. Not enough information to judge

Simply enter the number that corresponds to your response.

Where would you expect the greatest benefit, if any?

Open response.

What concerns or reservations, if any, do you have about the proposed approach?

1. Implementation cost or staff workload
2. Compatibility with existing systems
3. Commercial data confidentiality or control
4. Ownership and ongoing maintenance of standards
5. Consistent adoption across the industry
6. Whether benefits would justify the effort
7. No concerns at this stage
8. Need more information before forming a view
9. Other

Enter your top three numbered responses. If selecting (9) Other, please add a note.These are possible reactions, not claims about the project.

How confident are you that the proposed Technical Working Group arrangements will allow broader industry needs to be heard?

1. Extremely confident
2. Very confident
3. Moderately confident
4. Slightly confident
5. Not at all confident
6. Not enough information to judge

Simply enter the number that corresponds to your response.

Name

Email

    Please answer the anti-spam question: 

Send